From Eddie’s feed to your inbox: what makes an announcement worth sending.
We want to report the developments that change a player’s decision. That starts with the original post and ends with a checked source trail.
A casino founder’s post can spread quickly. The more useful question is what a reader can actually do with the information: has an offer changed, has a deadline moved, or has an account rule become different?
Start with the original item
For social reporting, our source record should contain the original post URL, the author, the publication time and any linked operator page. A screenshot without a traceable post is a lead to investigate, not a completed report. Until the original item has been checked, it belongs in the reporting queue.
Separate the announcement from the terms
A headline prize pool tells you little about who can enter or how much play an entry requires. The competition rules are where minimum bets, identity checks, VIP tiers, region restrictions and claim deadlines belong. An announcement and a complete set of terms can be published in different places.
Add the part a reader cannot get from a repost
Our job is to explain what changed, who it affects, and what still needs verification. That can mean comparing a new rule with its previous version or noticing that a headline reward applies to a small calculation base. Opinion should be labeled as our reading, with the underlying facts linked.
What belongs in the newsletter
The intended edition is a short digest of consequential updates and clearly qualified offers. It should earn a place in an inbox by making a decision easier, not by sending every casino announcement. Our first edition will be announced here when subscriptions open.
Sources & further reading
Our coverage distinguishes announcements from verified outcomes. Casino availability, offers and requirements can change. Always read the operator's current terms.
How we research →